| Summary | National Percentile | Rank vs Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | 77th | Fair |
| Demographics | 90th | Best |
| Amenities | 99th | Best |
Multifamily Valuation
| Property Details | |
|---|---|
| Address | 300 Arguello Blvd, San Francisco, CA, 94118, US |
| Region / Metro | San Francisco |
| Year of Construction | 1972 |
| Units | 24 |
| Transaction Date | --- |
| Transaction Price | --- |
| Buyer | --- |
| Seller | --- |
300 Arguello Blvd San Francisco Multifamily Investment
Positioned in an A+ urban core with deep renter demand and high household incomes at the neighborhood level, according to WDSuite’s CRE market data, supporting stable leasing potential for well-managed assets.
300 Arguello Blvd sits in an A+–rated Urban Core neighborhood ranked 6 out of 193 in the San Francisco–San Mateo–Redwood City metro, indicating a competitive location among metro neighborhoods. Amenity access is a clear strength, with neighborhood measures for groceries, parks, pharmacies, cafés, and restaurants placing in the top percentiles nationally, supporting day-to-day convenience and renter retention.
The property’s 1972 vintage is newer than much of the surrounding stock (the neighborhood skews pre–World War II), which can offer relative competitiveness versus older buildings while still warranting targeted capital planning for aging systems and modernization initiatives.
Renter-occupied housing accounts for a majority share at the neighborhood level, signaling a sizable tenant base for multifamily. Within a 3-mile radius, WDSuite data shows high incomes and a predominantly renter household mix today, with projections pointing to a larger number of households alongside smaller average household sizes over the next five years. That dynamic can translate into a broader renter pool and supports occupancy stability for well-located assets.
Ownership costs remain elevated in this area relative to national norms, and neighborhood rents benchmark high as well. For investors, this typically sustains reliance on multifamily housing and can support pricing power and lease retention where properties are well maintained and professionally managed, while requiring attentive lease management to navigate affordability pressure.
Neighborhood safety compares below national averages based on WDSuite’s indicators, and it tracks on the higher side of crime relative to many U.S. neighborhoods. That said, estimated year-over-year trends show double-digit declines across both property and violent offenses, suggesting recent directional improvement. As always, investors should evaluate block-by-block conditions, operating practices, and security measures when underwriting urban core assets.
Within the metro context, the area’s safety profile should be interpreted alongside its strong amenity access and employment proximity. Maintaining onsite management standards and resident engagement can help support leasing stability despite a below-average national safety percentile.
The neighborhood benefits from proximity to major employers concentrated in San Francisco’s core, supporting a large professional workforce and commute convenience for renters. Key nearby employers include McKesson, Wells Fargo, Ameriprise Financial, Pfizer, and McKesson Ventures.
- McKesson Ventures — venture investment (3.1 miles)
- McKesson — healthcare distribution (3.1 miles) — HQ
- Wells Fargo — banking (3.1 miles) — HQ
- Ameriprise Financial — financial services (3.3 miles)
- Pfizer — biopharma offices (3.3 miles)
This 1972, 24-unit asset is positioned in one of the metro’s most competitive neighborhoods, with top-tier amenity access and a renter-driven housing mix that supports multifamily demand. Within a 3-mile radius, high incomes and an expanding household count alongside smaller household sizes indicate a broader tenant base over time, which can support occupancy stability and lease retention for well-run properties.
Elevated ownership costs in the neighborhood reinforce reliance on rental housing, while neighborhood rents remain strong. According to commercial real estate analysis from WDSuite, the area’s fundamentals and employer proximity underpin durable demand, though underwriting should account for urban safety considerations and ongoing capex for a 1970s vintage building.
- A+ urban core location ranked 6 of 193 in the metro, supporting durable renter demand
- 1972 vintage offers relative competitiveness vs. older stock with clear value-add/modernization levers
- High ownership costs and strong neighborhood rents support pricing power and lease retention
- Proximity to major employers sustains a deep professional tenant base and commute convenience
- Risk: below-average national safety percentile and urban-core variability require prudent operations and underwriting